Lightdash vs. Looker: A Comprehensive Guide

Lightdash and Looker are two popular business intelligence (BI) platforms designed to empower analytics teams and small to medium-sized businesses to extract valuable insights from their data. Both platforms emphasize self-service capabilities, allowing non-technical users to build reports, create dashboards, and schedule the sending of CSVs, charts, and tables.

This self-service approach is particularly beneficial for analytics teams that want to avoid the bottleneck of handling requests and tickets for common data pulls. Instead of continually expanding your analytics team to meet demand, why not empower your organization to access the data they need? This ‘teach a man to fish’ paradigm fosters a culture of data consumption across your business.

However, it’s important to note that enabling your organization as data consumers does require some upfront modeling and maintenance.

Key Features and Functionality

Data Modeling:

Both Lightdash and Looker require pre-defined models to effectively manage and utilize data. These models establish the relationships between your data objects and outline how to aggregate that data. Typically, data is organized into dimensions (columns) and metrics (aggregates).

While both platforms encourage joins between objects to enhance data interconnectivity, this may necessitate some education for end users regarding data granularity. By enabling these models, both Lightdash and Looker can dynamically generate SQL queries to access your data warehouse. This feature is crucial, as it empowers non-technical users to effectively ‘write’ queries and pull data independently, epitomizing the concept of self-service analytics.

Lightdash

  • Lightdash integrates with dbt (Data Build Tool), offering a flexible approach to data modeling and transformation.
  • If your dbt metrics are well-defined, Lightdash requires minimal additional work, allowing your analytics teams to focus on insights rather than maintenance.
  • It pulls information directly from your dbt metadata, ensuring that your data documentation remains consistent and up-to-date.
  • Lightdash enables the passing of variables, such as user properties (e.g., user email), into your models. This feature allows for granular access control, providing users with the appropriate level of data visibility.

Looker

  • Looker employs its proprietary LookML language for data modeling. While this approach offers powerful capabilities, it may also introduce a level of complexity that requires a steeper learning curve.
  • Looker utilizes manifest files to define constants, localization variables, and instructions for importing other model files.
  • Looker allows the creation of derived tables outside of your ETL layer. This capability can be advantageous for larger organizations where collaboration between data teams across departments can take significant time.

Collaboration, Sharing, and Integrations:

Both Lightdash and Looker excel in collaboration and sharing features. Each platform allows for embedding analytics directly within proprietary software, although there are differences in licensing:

  • Embedding: Looker requires an embed license for each user, which can lead to increased costs, especially for larger teams. In contrast, Lightdash, hosted by Driftwave, operates on a per-instance pricing model, eliminating the need for individual licenses for embedded users.

Both tools support automated report distribution through popular channels such as Email, Slack, and Google Sheets, ensuring that stakeholders receive timely insights. They also integrate seamlessly with all common databases and data warehouses, making it easy to pull in and analyze data.

Additionally, both platforms support user groups and role-based access control (RBAC), allowing organizations to manage permissions and ensure data security.

Lightdash: 

  • Lightdash features built-in commenting capabilities within dashboards.
  • As an open-source platform, Lightdash allows for extensive integrations.

Looker: 

  • Looker’s licensing model can become costly due to the requirement of a license for each user. This is an important consideration for small to medium-sized businesses that need to manage budget constraints.
  • Currently, Looker offers a preview feature for select users, integrating with Gemini to generate LookML code and visualizations.

Data Visualization:

Both Lightdash and Looker provide a solid foundation for data visualization, covering essential chart types such as bar, line, pie, and tables, along with a user-friendly dashboarding experience. Their primary focus is on data accessibility, allowing users to easily interpret and interact with data. However, neither platform matches the level of custom visualization available in tools like Tableau, Power BI, or Metabase.

Both tools also offer features like cross-filtering within dashboards, enabling users to explore data relationships dynamically. Users can also define theming options, including color schemes, to create a coherent presentation of data.

Lightdash: 

  • Lightdash stores a version history for charts, allowing users to easily roll back to previous versions of charts or dashboards when necessary.

Looker: 

  • As a Google-owned product, Looker integrates seamlessly with Google Maps, enhancing location-based data visualizations.

Pricing and Deployment Options:

Both Lightdash and Looker provide a solid foundation for data visualization, covering essential chart types such as bar, line, pie, and tables, along with a user-friendly dashboarding experience. Their primary focus is on data accessibility, allowing users to easily interpret and interact with data. However, neither platform matches the level of custom visualization available in tools like Tableau, Power BI, or Metabase.

Both tools also offer features like cross-filtering within dashboards, enabling users to explore data relationships dynamically. Users can also define theming options, including color schemes, to create a coherent presentation of data.

Lightdash: 

  • Lightdash offers a cost-effective alternative for analytics teams. Organizations can self-host Lightdash on their own infrastructure at no cost, making it an attractive option for those looking to minimize expenses.
  • For teams that prefer not to manage the DevOps side of things, Driftwave provides expert hosting services, ensuring that your analytics capabilities are fully supported without the operational burden. Additionally, we offer three months of free Lightdash hosting for organizations currently utilizing dbt in their data stack, allowing teams to experience the platform’s benefits without immediate financial commitment.

Looker: 

  • In contrast, Looker is positioned as a premium BI solution in the marketplace. While its pricing may be higher than other options, many organizations find that the benefits of robust self-service analytics justify the investment.
  • Pricing varies significantly, with Viewer licenses typically ranging from $15 to $50, and Explorer licenses from $30 to $75. Organizations should carefully evaluate their analytics needs and user count when considering the overall value of Looker.

Selecting the right business intelligence platform is essential for empowering your analytics team and driving data-driven decisions.

Ultimately, the choice between Lightdash and Looker should be based on your organization’s specific needs, budget, and desired complexity in data modeling. By understanding these key differences, you can make an informed decision that enhances your analytics efforts and empowers your team to leverage data effectively.